Which came first, Christians or Greeks?

The View is a tv show that has offered the world all kinds of insight into what really goes on in the world.  A while back we learned that fire can’t melt steel.  I need an image here:
iron smelter
Now, we learn that Christians predate Greeks thanks to Sherri Shepherd:

“Keep in mind that probably when [Epicurus] was around, there was no Jesus Christ stuff going on,” said co-host Whoppi Goldberg said.

“They still had Christians back then,” Shepherd interrupted.

“They had gods,” Goldberg said.

“They had Christians,” Shepherd insisted. “And they threw ‘em to the lions.”

“I think this might predate that,” Goldberg said.

“I don’t think anything predated Christians,” Shepherd shot back.

Behar then piped in.

“The Greeks came first, then the Romans, then the Christians,” she said.

“Jesus came first, before then,” Shepherd said.

“No, not on paper,” Goldberg sadly said, meaning the Bible.

Just for chucks and giggles, a timeline of the great civilizations prior to the assent of Christianity:
civilizations
By their definition, there were approximately thirty-something “great” civilizations before 1AD.  1AD is the year Jesus was born.  Now, she can take most people’s word for it, or she could just visit Rome or Athens and see some of the stuff that’s there.  Even the source of her confusion, the Bible, clearly refers to the Romans throughout the entire book.  Therefore, it would seem, that the Romans HAD to predate Christians since the Bible is the documentation of the Christian revolution.

I just can’t wait to read about the next amazing piece of logic The View will offer.

An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything

Three years ago I wrote a post about three American scientists winning a Nobel for their Theory of Everything.  Now, this thing was amazingly complex, and even harder for me to believe.  It involved something called string theory, quarks, dark matter, and lots of other stuff.  I gave up even trying to follow it all.  They came up with the theory, proving it was correct became a heck of a challenge.

Now, it seems, it might have been not so accurate after all.  A. Garrett Lisi has come up with basically the same principal, but it’s a LOT simpler.  Now, I’m not gonna go so far as to say I understand this one either, yet.  But, I’ve got a lot more chance to since it doesn’t toss in string theory, quarks, and a bunch of dark matter.  It just simply addresses the relationship between gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces.

Lisi won’t assert that his theory is right yet.  It’ll take some work to prove it is.  However, I think he’s more on the right track than the previous Theory of Everything was.

Just for chucks and giggles, here’s the E8 Lattice at work:


How’d you like to put that to math?

This is very cool.

One language dies every two weeks?

That’s the headline that accompanied this:

While there are an estimated 7,000 languages spoken around the world today, one of them dies out about every two weeks, according to linguistic experts struggling to save at least some of them……

Losing languages means losing knowledge, says K. David Harrison, an assistant professor of linguistics at Swarthmore College.

“When we lose a language, we lose centuries of human thinking about time, seasons, sea creatures, reindeer, edible flowers, mathematics, landscapes, myths, music, the unknown and the everyday.”

As many as half of the current languages have never been written down, he estimated.

Now, given the advent of the silicon age and our newfound ability to store massive amounts of data easily and permanently, I have no problem with documenting some of these languages that will be soon extinct.  However, I don’t really buy into the lost “knowledge”.  What these cultures have done is simply take their thinking and adapt it to a different language that allows them to exist in the 21st century.  The world keeps getting smaller every day.  Isolation is no longer a viable means of existing.  Because of this, man needs to, and is, evolving to fewer languages.  Dialects remain intact, and local lingo reflects the unique aspects of their local environment.  However, having 7,000 different words for the sun is meaningless.  I have never liked the problems differing languages have created for mankind.  It leads to wars and such as people use it to isolate their society from others.  This just doesn’t need to happen.  It serves no purpose at all.  I’m not endorsing a New World Order with only one language, but having languages where only a hundred or so people speak it today is pointless.

Document it for prosperity.  But, let evolution take it’s course.  The obsolete become that way for a reason.  If a word has a unique meaning, incorporate it into existing languages.  US English is certainly not what the English spoke five hundred years ago.  There is a reason for that.

Global Warming fails Adrian Flanagan

SOME people have been telling us for a while that the ice is melting at the poles due specifically to global warming.  Al Gore says so too.  Based on that information, Adrian Flanagan set out to do what no man could have done before, sail the North Pole.  However, he’s hit a snag:

A BRITISH yachtsman attempting the first solo Arctic sea passage across northern Russia was examining his options after heavier than expected ice blocked his route, his manager said.

So, he’s got a Plan B:

Adrian Flanagan is discussing with Russian authorities the possibility of using a nuclear-powered icebreaker to lift his boat out of the water and carry it round the most icebound stretch of Russia’s Northern Sea Route.

It’s rumored he’s having to keep an eye on global warming endangered polar bears while he figures out how to get out of the mess he’s in.

I really don’t know if he set out to prove global warming is that much of an issue or not.  It does make for a hoot of a story though.

Branson to send Hawking to space ( VERY COOL! )

British billionaire Richard Branson says he’s sending over a medical officer to talk with physicist Stephen Hawking about getting him into space. That’s how the founder of Virgin Galactic responded to Hawking’s comment that "maybe Richard Branson will help" him achieve his long-held goal of reaching the final frontier, even though he’s a quadriplegic who needs a blink-controlled computer to communicate.

If there is any one person on this planet who deserves a trip to space, it’s Stephen Hawking.  I really don’t fully comprehend the nature of Hawking’s illness, but if he can survive the trip, I hope the medical examiners find a way to accomodate him.  I know Branson will.

This planet sure needs a lot more Richard Bransons right now.

Al Gore being Al Gore again

"Very few people have analyzed the insides of this new space policy. I urge all of you who are interested in space to analyze it very carefully. It has the potential, down the road, to create the [same] kind of fuzzy thinking and chaos in our efforts to exploit the space resource as the fuzzy thinking and chaos the Iraq policy has created in Iraq. It is a very serious mistake, in my opinion.

“We in the United States of America may claim that we alone can determine who goes into space and who doesn’t, what it’s used for and what it’s not used for, and we may claim it effectively as our own dominion to the exclusion, when we wish to exclude others, of all others. That’s hubristic.”

For those that don’t use really long words when every day words will do, hubristic means arrogant.  Now, the part I don’t get is what exactly is he complaining about?  Here is the National Security section from 1996 version Gore and Clinton established:

(1) The United States will conduct those space activities necessary for national security. These activities will be overseen by the Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) consistent with their respective responsibilities as set forth in the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, other applicable law, and Executive Order 12333. Other departments and agencies will assist as appropriate.

(2) Improving our ability to support military operations worldwide, monitor and respond to strategic military threats, and monitor arms control and non-proliferation agreements and activities are key priorities for national security space activities. The Secretary of Defense and DCI shall ensure that defense and intelligence space activities are closely coordinated; that space architectures are integrated to the maximum extent feasible; and will continue to modernize and improve their respective activities to collect against, and respond to, changing threats, environments and adversaries.

(3) National security space activities shall contribute to U.S. national security by:

(a) providing support for the United States’ inherent right of self-defense and our defense commitments to allies and friends;

(b) deterring, warning, and if necessary, defending against enemy attack;

(c) assuring that hostile forces cannot prevent our own use of space;

(d) countering, if necessary, space systems and services used for hostile purposes;

(e) enhancing operations of U.S. and allied forces;

(f) ensuring our ability to conduct military and intelligence space-related activities;

(g) satisfying military and intelligence requirements during peace and crisis as well as through all levels of conflict;

(h) supporting the activities of national policy makers, the intelligence community, the National Command Authorities, combatant commanders and the military services, other federal officials, and continuity of government operations.

    (4) Critical capabilities necessary for executing space missions must be assured. This requirement will be considered and implemented at all stages of architecture and system planning, development, acquisition, operation, and support.

    (5) The Department of Energy, in coordination with DoD, ACDA and the DCI will carry out research on and development of technologies needed to effectively verify international agreements to control special nuclear materials and nuclear weapons.

    (6) Defense Space Sector Guidelines:

    (a) DoD shall maintain the capability to execute the mission areas of space support, force enhancement, space control, and force application.

    (b) In accordance with Executive Orders and applicable directives, DoD shall protect critical space-related technologies and mission aspects.

    (c) DoD, as launch agent for both the defense and intelligence sectors, will maintain the capability to evolve and support those space transportation systems, infrastructure, and support activities necessary to meet national security requirements. DoD will be the lead agency for improvement and evolution of the current expendable launch vehicle fleet, including appropriate technology development.

    (d) DoD will pursue integrated satellite control and continue to enhance the robustness of its satellite control capability. DoD will coordinate with other departments and agencies, as appropriate, to foster the integration and interoperability of satellite control for all governmental space activities.

    (e) The Secretary of Defense will establish DoD’s specific requirements for military and national-level intelligence information.

    (f) The Secretary of Defense, in concert with the DCI, and for the purpose of supporting operational military forces, may propose modifications or augmentations to intelligence space systems as necessary. The DoD may develop and operate space systems to support military operations in the event that intelligence space systems cannot provide the necessary intelligence support to the DoD.

    (g) Consistent with treaty obligations, the United States will develop, operate and maintain space control capabilities to ensure freedom of action in space and, if directed, deny such freedom of action to adversaries. These capabilities may also be enhanced by diplomatic, legal or military measures to preclude an adversary’s hostile use of space systems and services. The U.S. will maintain and modernize space surveillance and associated battle management command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence to effectively detect, track, categorize, monitor, and characterize threats to U.S. and friendly space systems and contribute to the protection of U.S. military activities.

    (h) The United States will pursue a ballistic missile defense program to provide for: enhanced theater missile defense capability later this decade; a national missile defense deployment readiness program as a hedge against the emergence of a long-range ballistic missile threat to the United States; and an advanced technology program to provide options for improvements to planned and deployed defenses.

      (7) Intelligence Space Sector Guidelines:

      (a) The DCI shall ensure that the intelligence space sector provides timely information and data to support foreign, defense and economic policies; military operations; diplomatic activities; indications and warning; crisis management; and treaty verification, and that the sector performs research and development related to these functions.

      (b) The DCI shall continue to develop and apply advanced technologies that respond to changes in the threat environment and support national intelligence priorities.

      (c) The DCI shall work closely with the Secretary of Defense to improve the intelligence space sector’s ability to support military operations worldwide.

      (d) The nature, the attributable collected information and the operational details of intelligence space activities will be classified. The DCI shall establish and implement policies to provide appropriate protection for such data, including provisions for the declassification and release of such information when the DCI deems that protection is no longer required.

      (e) Collected information that cannot be attributed to space systems will be classified according to its content.

      (f) These guidelines do not apply to imagery product, the protection of which is governed by Executive Order 12951.

      (g) Strict security procedures will be maintained to ensure that public discussion of satellite reconnaissance by Executive Branch personnel and contractors is consistent with DCI guidance. Executive Branch personnel and contractors should refrain from acknowledging or releasing information regarding satellite reconnaissance until a security review has been made.

      (h) The following facts are UNCLASSIFIED:

      (i) That the United States conducts satellite photoreconnaissance for peaceful purposes, including intelligence collection and monitoring arms control agreements.

      (ii) That satellite photoreconnaissance includes a near real-time capability and is used to provide defense-related information for indications and warning, and the planning and conduct of military operations.

      (iii) That satellite photoreconnaissance is used in the collection of mapping, charting, and geodetic data and such data is provided to authorized federal agencies.

      (iv) That satellite photoreconnaissance is used to collect mapping, charting and geodetic data to develop global geodetic and cartographic materials to support defense and other mapping-related activities.

      (v) That satellite photoreconnaissance can be used to collect scientific and environmental data and data on natural or man-made disasters, and such data can be disseminated to authorized federal agencies.

      (vi) That photoreconnaissance assets can be used to image the United States and its territories and possessions.

      (vii) That the U.S. conducts overhead signals intelligence collection.

      (viii) That the U.S. conducts overhead measurement and signature intelligence collection.

      (ix) The existence of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and the identification and official titles of its senior officials. All other details, facts and products of intelligence space activities are subject to appropriate classification and security controls as determined by the DCI.

      (i) Changes to the space intelligence security policy set forth in the national space policy can be authorized only by the President.

      What it did was give carte blanche priviledges to the US to do whatever it wanted based on the whims of the President and/or Pentagon.  What Bush has done is spell out specific purposes and policies that the US will be shooting for.  The result of the 1996 version was basically nothing.  Whether the 2006 results in anything substantial remains to be seen.  However, as usual, Al Gore is just being critical for the sake of being critical only. 

      When asked if his comments were on the record, Gore replied negatively.  That’s par for the course.  I’m sure he’s waiting to make a movie or book so he can make more money pandering to the anti-Bush crowd.

      I’m not going to claim this is a great policy document or not.  What I am going to do is assert that the 1996 version was worse, left NASA in a state of no leadership and direction, and therefore Gore has no room whatsoever to criticize anything anyone else does.

      Grigori Perelman

      This is Grigori Perelman.  He kinda looks like Forrest Gump to me.  What’s even weirder to me is he seems to think like Forrest as well.  Here’s the scoop.  A fella named Henri Poincaire pondered in 1904 that, get this, a certain condition suffices to ensure that a manifold is homeomorphic to a sphere.  Yeah, I know, everyone ponders that occasionally, especially when the spouse and kids are away.  However, Poincaire put it in writing whereas no one else ever bothered to do so.  This question so stumped mathematicians for 95 years that the Clay Mathematics Institute offered a $1,000,000 prize for whoever figured it out.  Well, it just so happened that in 2003 or so, Forrest Grigori looked at Richard Hamilton’s work, which was something like this:

      “Hamilton’s basic idea is to formulate a “dynamical process” in which a given 3-manifold is geometrically distorted, such that this distortion process is governed by a differential equation analogous to the heat equation. The heat equation describes the behavior of scalar quantities such as temperature, and it ensures that “hot spots” of temperature will dissipate as the temperature becomes more evenly distributed, until a uniform temperature is achieved throughout an object with finite volume. The Ricci flow describes the behavior of a tensorial quantity, the Ricci curvature tensor, under the Ricci flow, barring singularities in the flow, concentrations of large curvature will spread out until the curvature is as uniform as possible over the entire 3-manifold. In principle the result is one of eight kinds of “normal form” or Thurston model geometry.”

      Got all that?  OK, it gets even better. Forrest Grigori came up with the concept of “Ricci flow with surgery”. Now, this was spectacular in that it allowed him to remove the singular regions in a nice way and continue the flow until further singularities develop in which case the removal, or “surgery”, is done again; this flow thus continues forever.  Is that cool or what?

      Now, the Forrest kicker.  Grigori has turned down the $1,000,000 prize, and subsequent world honors and prizes, and prefers to live with his mother.

      I bet his mom is real pissed right about now.