TV energy consumption

Here’s something I really did not know.  I fully ASSUMED that the newer technologies reduced energy consumption by a lot.  However, that’s not necessarily true.  Here’s a list of TV’s with their energy consumption ranked best to last:

Model HDTV type Screen size Default setting (watts)  ↑
Panasonic TH-65VX100U plasma 65 575.56
Panasonic TH-58PZ750U plasma 58 562.52
Panasonic TH-50PZ800U plasma 50 535.00
Samsung PN63A760 plasma 63 509.24
LG 60PG60 plasma 60 507.83
Vizio VP505XVT plasma 50 474.03
Panasonic TH-46PZ85U plasma 46 454.51
Panasonic TH-50PF11UK plasma 50 449.62
Samsung PN50A550 plasma 50 446.60
LG 50PG30 plasma 50 401.67
LG 50PG50 plasma 50 401.02
LG 50PS80 plasma 50 384.98
Samsung PN50A650 plasma 50 380.58
Hitachi P50H401 plasma 50 336.10
Pioneer PRO-111FD plasma 50 333.54
Pioneer PDP-5020FD plasma 50 293.33
Sony KDL-52XBR7 LCD 52 285.68
LG 50PG20 plasma 50 284.64
Vizio VP422 plasma 42 283.83
Panasonic TC-P54G10 plasma 54 282.85
Vizio VO47LF LCD 47 277.52
Sony KDL-46W4100 LCD 46 274.43
Sony KDL-52XBR6 LCD 52 272.63
Sony KDL-46Z4100 LCD 46 268.57
LG 47LG60 LCD 47 267.21
Mitsubishi LT-46148 LCD 46 263.78
Panasonic TH-42PX80U plasma 42 260.18
Olevia 252T FHD LCD 52 257.29
Panasonic TC-P50V10 plasma 50 255.61
Samsung PN50B650 plasma 50 252.04
Philips 47PFL9732D LCD 47 250.10
Westinghouse VK-40F580D LCD 40 246.81
Sony KDL-52V5100 LCD 52 242.62
Sony KDL-55XBR8 LCD 55 239.83
Vizio SV470XVT LCD 47 239.59
Sony KDL-52XBR9 LCD 52 237.52
Haier HL47K LCD 47 237.30
Vizio VF550XVT LCD 55 221.03
Samsung LN52A650 LCD 52 219.90
Mitsubishi WD-65735 RPTV 65 219.27
Toshiba 42RV530U LCD 42 218.08
Panasonic TC-P50X1 plasma 50 217.95
Insignia NS-PDP42 plasma 42 216.76
Sharp LC-52D65U LCD 52 210.35
Mitsubishi WD-65737 RPTV 65 208.45
Honeywell Altura MLX LCD 42 207.27
Samsung PN50B850 plasma 50 207.01
Panasonic TH-58PZ800U plasma 58 196.37
Samsung LN52B750 LCD 52 191.15
Panasonic TC-P42S1 plasma 42 187.17
LG 47LH50 LCD 47 186.55
Samsung LN46A750 LCD 46 184.62
Hitachi UT37X902 LCD 37 183.73
Sharp LC-46D85U LCD 46 182.32
Toshiba 47ZV650U LCD 47 181.26
Toshiba 46XV545U LCD 46 178.59
Toshiba 46SV670U LCD 46 174.87
Samsung LN46B650 LCD 46 174.10
Samsung HL61A750 RPTV 61 171.24
Sony KDL-46W5100 LCD 46 169.87
Panasonic TC-P46G10 plasma 46 168.78
Panasonic TH-50PZ850U plasma 50 163.80
Vizio VF551XVT LCD 55 161.95
Sony KLV-40ZX1M LCD 40 160.65
Samsung LN46A950 LCD 46 145.98
Vizio VOJ370F LCD 37 145.84
Insignia NS-LCD32 LCD 32 143.20
Panasonic TC-37LZ85 LCD 37 142.69
LG 47LH90 LCD 47 140.86
LG 42LH55 LCD 42 137.65
Samsung LN46A550 LCD 46 137.12
Philips 42PFL6704D LCD 42 136.80
Samsung UNB558500 LCD 55 136.16
JVC LT-46P300 LCD 46 132.78
Toshiba 32CV510U LCD 32 131.34
Samsung LN32A450 LCD 32 130.65
LG 42LH30 LCD 42 127.38
Sharp LC-32D44U LCD 32 126.25
Sony KDL-46VE5 LCD 46 125.31
Vizio VP322 plasma 32 122.97
Vizio VO32LF LCD 32 121.58
LG 32LG30 LCD 32 117.88
LG 32LG40 LCD 32 116.19
Samsung UN46B8000 LCD 46 114.48
Sony KDL-32M4000 LCD 32 112.94
Samsung UN46B7000 LCD 46 106.77
Samsung UN46B6000 LCD 46 106.40
Vizio VO32L LCD 32 104.90
Sharp LC-46LE700UN LCD 46 101.58
Panasonic TC-32LX85 LCD 32 97.79
Panasonic TC-L32X1 LCD 32 92.10
Philips 42PFL5603D LCD 42 91.23

You have to go all the way to #41 to get the older style rear projection screen.  Pretty amazing to me.  Guess it pays to double check what you take for granted sometimes huh?  This was brought to my attention because California is now regulating tv power usage.

The Big One

Is it me?  Am I the only one that gets the impression that every single time there is an earthquake in southern California, it’s a dress rehearsal for “the big one”?  I swear this has been going on my entire life.

Now, given the tectonics of southern California, there no-doubt will be a “big one”.  But, I imagine there will be thousands of “not-big” ones until that happens.  Yesterday’s 5.4 is a “sorta-big one”.  There was basically no real serious damage done.  I know an 8 would do a lot more damage, but 8’s are very rare.  The problem I have with all this is the same effect of what happened in New Orleans.  There were so many false-alarms that hit the Gulf Coast that when “the big one” did strike, a lot of people had ignored the warnings.  Maybe it would be better if we just reported things a little more responsibly and not compare each and every decent earthquake as a precursor to “the big one” since “the big one” has never followed any of the earthquakes they have compared it to?

Then, as a seperate dialogue completely, occasionally run stories on “the big one” and what can be done to mitigate it.

Office of Potentially Hazardous Near-Earth Object Preparedness

Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, who has possibly the longest name in Congress, and who represents California, which is a very long name as well, has taken their comfort level with very long words to the next level by proposing the Office of Potentially Hazardous Near-Earth Object Preparedness, as part of the Near Earth Objects Preparedness Act.  Now, in the past, I have complained about the obvious confusion created by the fact several world agencies are trying to track NEO’s.  So, I am all for this concept of one single entity coordinating research activities.  However, you’d think they could come up with something a little easier to print than the Office of Potentially Hazardous Near-Earth Object Preparedness.  Something like Asteroid Busters I would think would work just as well and not cripple the Earth’s limited resources in the process.  I mean, think about it.  If you were the receptionist, you’d have to answer every call with “Thank you for calling the Office of Potentially Hazardous Near-Earth Object Preparedness.  How may I direct your call?  En Espanol,  Gracias por llamar a la Oficina de potencialmente peligrosos cercanos a la Tierra de objetos de Preparación. ¿Cómo es posible dirigir su llamada? ”  God forbid the caller speaks a different language.  In the course of answering the call, the hazardous near-Earth object might very well have become a hazardous on-Earth object.

UFO’s just keep popping up all over the place

Well, maybe not physically.  But, they might be soon.  The latest round started when Leslie Kean of the Coalitio0n for Freedom of Information sued NASA regarding the crash of something in Pennsylvania in 1965.  He contends it’s a cover-up.  A judge made NASA give him all their documentation.  This could be interesting.  In what way, I don’t know.  But to say the least, UFO peeps are always interesting.

From Glenn BeckWhich leads us to the next headline, Dennis Kucinich claims to have seen a UFO.  Now in defense of Dennis, he had a witness.  That would be Shirley MacLaine.  She says they saw it in her book you have to pay for to read.  Needless to say, the combo of Kucinich and MacLaine have led a lot of otherwise less vested peeps to truly believe there was something flying over their heads that evening.  However, because he’s still running for President of the United States of America, and therefore would gain control over NASA if elected, this has very serious implications that I think a lot of political pundits have not considered.  According to who you ask, LOTS of people believe in UFO’s.  If Kucinich harnesses that voter bloc, well, let me just say things could get interesting in the weirdest possible way.  Kucinich is kinda nuts if you ask me.  Of course, that does not mean squat whether he can be elected or not.  Remember Jimmy Carter?  Hmmm?  See where I’m going with this?  Before you claim I’m as screwy as Dennis, Shirley, or Jimmy, read UFO Politics at the White House: Citizens Rally ‘Round Jimmy Carter’s Promise.  I haven’t, but the title sounds like what I want to get across.

Now, the reason I am going this route is because there’s a circle forming here.  And it looks suspicious to me.  I might actually be forming my first full-blown conspiracy theory here.  Follow me with this, it’s not too difficult.  Kucinich is running pretty much dead last in every poll imaginable.  His only real issue is pushing the button how far out there he is.  Nothing is moving this guy out of dead last.  Whatever he had to say was largely ignored in a hailstorm of publicity for Hillary or Barack.  Now, all of a sudden, just before primary season starts sprinting to the finish line, “evidence” from NASA is compelled to be released to the public that MIGHT prove Kucinich isn’t completely off his rocker ( on this one issue anyway ).  And, NASA releases THIS pic today:
UFO
What’s that look like huh?

I look for NASA to start dropping those out of the sky right before the California primaries.