The details are in an audio link. The very concept that the major pollution problem in the Arctic are not manmade is a profound leap from all the "evidence" environmentalists would have us believe. I would be a lot more skeptical of this article if it were from junkscience.com. But, it’s not, it’s from NPR. No news organization has been a larger support of the environmentalists than NPR. For them to run this article baffles me.
Related Posts
September 22, 2007 -- Bio-fuels worse for the environment than gas? (0) Here's the story:
Research findings published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics calculate that corn and rapeseed biodiesels produce up to 70 percent and 50 percent more greenhouse g...
November 20, 2004 -- Lower or higher Emissions? (0) 2003 Status Report Shows U.S. Air Cleanest Ever Since 1970
Cynthia Bergman 202-564-9828 / bergman.cynthia@epa.govTotal emissions of the six principal pollutants identified in the Clean Air Act dro...
September 1, 2004 -- Sustainable Oil? (3) This article was brought to my attention by DirtyDingus on The Motley Fool. Before I go any further, please read it. Nothing else makes any sense if you don't because it's a fairly radical idea tha...
April 19, 2006 -- The Next Ice Age? (2) Scientists were so concerned with the Merapi Volcano in Indonesia that they urged people to run away, far away:
So far, most of the locals aren't terribly impressed. They ci...
December 11, 2007 -- New Dinosaur discovered in Antarctica? (0) Here's the headline:
New Dinosaur Discovered in Antarctica
Sounds exciting huh? I mean, visions of Jurassic Park started racing through my mind. Business ideas started popping up. Who wouldn't ...
